About Facebook With censorship it is a matter worthy of being studied, because as is usually said, it is too often dedicated to "putting fences to the field", which is the way of saying that it is dedicated to doing somewhat inexplicable things about things that are not It should try to limit.
What can anyone see in this photo to censor it? Yes, you can see her nipples. Yes, she is naked. Yes, the baby is naked. But no, It is not a pornographic photo nor does it have sexual connotations because the important thing about this photo is not that they wear more or less clothes, but the look and gesture of a mother who is welcoming her new arrival baby.
Someone from the private group reported the photo
The woman in this photo is Francie, a New York-based mom who gave birth at home and posted the photo in a private Facebook group to celebrate her daughter's birthday. In this group, aimed primarily at pregnant women and women who are already mothers, someone considered that it should be censored.
The surprise he took is similar to the one that many people take for the same reason when he hangs photos of their births or breastfeeding their babies and the popular social network ends up censoring them. And above all because he didn't hang it on his wall, more or less publicly, but in a private group in which the different delivery options are usually discussed: at home, in the hospital, according to what each health insurance covers in New York, etc.
But Facebook's policy is clear
However, Facebook says it clearly: all images receive the same treatment worldwide, everywhere, and the fact that it has been published in a private group does not make the nude can be considered valid. Even when what you see is a woman giving birth.
Now the administrator of the group, Nora Painten, and Francie, expect Facebook to change its mind regarding the photo in the same way it did at the time with breastfeeding, when she decided to stop censoring the images when the woman was breastfeeding .
Even Kimm Sol, a midwife who is also part of the group, has spoken about it:
I am sincerely perplexed by the act of shaming a woman by removing her image simply because they have the power to do so. This is the image of a woman published to show the birth of her daughter, the beauty of her body, her courage, and a photograph that has had such a positive response, full of praise, and in a private group, where the members They have asked to be part of that group.
Now we have to wait to see if Facebook changes its mind and allows the image to continue to be seen on the social network, which would be logical and normal, because not all nudes should be treated in the same way: they are censoring the way in which babies they come to the world, They are censoring the way they themselves came into the world!
